Frank Lloyd’s blog

Art, architecture and the people that I know.

Lights, Camera…and Research

with 2 comments

We get a lot of questions about the preparation that goes into an exhibition. Truth be told, it’s endless. First, of course, is the conception of the show and the research. For Sensual/ Mechanical, the research has been going on for over 18 months. I’ve wanted to organize a show that demonstrates the origins of Kauffman’s work, ever since reading several articles published at the beginning of 2010. Critics and authors seemed unaware of Kauffman’s beginnings as a painter, and his intentions as an artist.  Equally, the critics seemed to be misinformed about the sensual content of the work.

Our research into oral histories, correspondence, and notebooks revealed a direct connection to Marcel Duchamp’s Large Glass, as well as to Frederick’s of Hollywood advertisements. Like Kauffman said, his sources included Dada, Duchamp, Mondrian, Abstract Expressionism and a “sexual biomorphic mixture with mechanical things.”

When the content is developed, we go about communicating the work—by photography as well as words. Moving these paintings around and setting up the photo shoot is a job for expert art handlers—and our photographer, Anthony Cuñha. We spend a lot of time and effort in setting up the shoot to create the pictures, but here’s a little peek behind the curtain—to show how the magic is made.
Art handlers are also called in when it’s time to hang the show. Carefully moving around these irreplaceable works of art, they place the pieces throughout the gallery. By the time their white-gloved hands are holding the work, a fully conceived layout has been made by the gallery director. All the works have been inspected and cleaned. The result is something that has been a big revelation for all viewers so far. Our show’s meaning and historical importance wasn’t lost on Hunter Drohojowska-Philp, who talked about the link to Marcel Duchamp on KCRW yesterday.


Written by Frank Lloyd

September 17, 2011 at 12:34 am

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. the installation looks beautiful. I like the low-hung view, is that hanging-height something that Kaufman consciously employed, or is your excellent curatorial instinct?

    Jake Tilson

    September 20, 2011 at 7:11 am

  2. The idea of hanging these paintings low comes from research into the archival materials. We found an installation photo from 1963, and it shows the intended height. That photo is reproduced on the previous post, titled “It’s. Craig Kauffman!” Or, I guess one could attrbute the hanging height to curatorial insight. Thanks for the comment, Jake.

    Frank Lloyd

    September 20, 2011 at 7:35 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s